"Dear Khem, you are an interesting one in that you tend to rebuff first with further questions…"
The mixing of religious and non-religious beliefs in an individual.
Quantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?
Quantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?
=.
In 1904 Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron
It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron
The electron and the em waves they are physical reality
Can evolution of consciousness of life begin on electron’s level?
==.
Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe
Electron takes important part in this work
Question:
Why does the simplest particle - electron have six ( 6 ) formulas:
E=h*f, e = +ah*c, e = -ah*c, +E=Mc^2, -E=Mc^2, E= ∞ ?
Nobody knows
Question:
Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ?
a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass
b) Maxwell’s equations
c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law
d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law
e) Fermi-Dirac statistics
Nobody knows.
====.
Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations:
"One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them."
====.
Ladies and Gentlemen !
Friends !
The banal Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe,
he is wiser than we are.
=====.
Once again: Brain and Electron.
Human brain works on two levels:
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and
subconsciousness from physical point of view ( interaction
between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean
that the state of neurons in these two situations is different.
How can we understand these different states of neurons?
How does the brain generate consciousness?
We can understand this situation only on the quantum level,
only using Quantum theory. But there isn’t QT without
Quantum of Light and Electron. So, what is interaction between
Quantum of Light, Electron and brain ? Nobody knows.
Therefore I say:
we must understand not only the brain but electron too.
And when we understand the Electron
we will know the Ultimate Nature of Reality.
=================.
Socratus
Views: 19
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Kernel John on -
Hi Socratus,
I'm currently in transit so have not had much time to attend to OSR dialogue. This should stabilize during the 2nd week in May.
Science and well reasoned thinking is always based on assumptions that, in some cases, are required to "prove" the conclusion of the argument. Change the assumption and the resulting conclusion changes accordingly.
I am not a scientist so do have not succumbed to a number of preconditioned biases.
Can evolution of consciousness of life begin on electron’s level?
Why would one assume that consciousness evolves and is not a metaphysical force equivalent to. say - for example, a physical force like gravity. Perhaps consciousness is something that is received via something called life and processed into something called awareness. Change the underlying assumption and the conclusion changes accordingly. When man assumed the earth was flat, he behaved as if it were. When man assumed it was round, new worlds were discovered. Change the assumption and . . . .
Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe. . .
The origin of life may be due to physical laws but what laws govern physical laws? Seriously, what laws govern metaphysical particles that travel faster than the speed of light - tachyons? This is a reasonable question that most of sciences narrowly claims is outside its purview.
Maybe, he (the electron) is wiser than we are?
This undoubtedly is true. The electron does not breach laws of behavior (action).
How does the brain generate consciousness?
The assumption being made here is that consciousness is an epiphenomenon of matter. Does matter produce consciousness or is consciousness a spiritual of metaphysical phenomenon? I think it time that science entertain the premise that inorganic matter does not self-organize and in the process create something we loosely call consciousness. Perhaps consciousness emanates from a non-physical realm? Is this premise worthy of philosophical entertainment?
- - - - - -
Socratus my friend, your presentation appears a rather traditional of reality. In so many ways, I agree with you but am prepared to extend the range of working assumptions a little further in order to possibly engage additional creative functions.
Gotta Go . . .
Top Content This Week
Latest Activity
Kernel John posted a discussionAre Your Religious Beliefs Plausible Facts of Prbable Fiction?
I very much enjoyed the recent Open Source Religion (OSR) discussion about the role regarding the…See More
Khem the Is Real-ite replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?"Please explain what you mean by "scientific". How could proceeding by trial and…"
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?"Your answer must go beyond the the faith mentioned in Hebrews 11:1 and all other similar universal…"
Roman Kozlowski posted a discussionWhat is God? And why the idea of God?
What is God? And why the idea of God?Please explain scientifically, providing irrefutable proof,…See More
Roman Kozlowski replied to Kernel John's discussion God God Para Gate"Cut circle into 4 parts - mmm?"
OpenSourceRlgn via Twitter@davidbgoode People don't rely on definition to believe in a God, they rely on belief. OSR promotes exploration and clarity of beliefs.
DavidBGoode via TwitterAs interesting as the idea of Open Source Religion is, why? If God can be defined by us, why have one at all? http://t.co/AE0FCIwJAa
RockOrocKCafe via TwitterFARFLUNG • Gleam - from the album -The Belief Module- [1998] [psychedelic] [space rock] -Salvo-... http://t.co/MYGgkwUfYW
© 2013 Created by Sidian M.S. Jones.
