Quantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?
In 1904 Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron
It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron
The electron and the em waves they are physical reality
Can evolution of consciousness of life begin on electron’s level?
Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe
Electron takes important part in this work
Why does the simplest particle - electron have six ( 6 ) formulas:
E=h*f, e = +ah*c, e = -ah*c, +E=Mc^2, -E=Mc^2, E= ∞ ?
Nobody knows
Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ?
a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass
b) Maxwell’s equations
c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law
d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law
e) Fermi-Dirac statistics
Nobody knows.
Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations:

"One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them."
Ladies and Gentlemen !
Friends !
The banal Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe,
he is wiser than we are.
Once again: Brain and Electron.
Human brain works on two levels:
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and
subconsciousness from physical point of view ( interaction
between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean
that the state of neurons in these two situations is different.
How can we understand these different states of neurons?
How does the brain generate consciousness?
We can understand this situation only on the quantum level,
only using Quantum theory. But there isn’t QT without
Quantum of Light and Electron. So, what is interaction between
Quantum of Light, Electron and brain ? Nobody knows.
Therefore I say:
we must understand not only the brain but electron too.
And when we understand the Electron
we will know the Ultimate Nature of Reality.

Views: 32

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Socratus,

I'm currently in transit so have not had much time to attend to OSR dialogue.  This should stabilize during the 2nd week in May.

Science and well reasoned thinking is always based on assumptions that, in some cases, are required to "prove" the conclusion of the argument.  Change the assumption and the resulting conclusion changes accordingly.

I am not a scientist so do have not succumbed to a number of preconditioned biases.

Can evolution of consciousness of life begin on electron’s level?

Why would one assume that consciousness evolves and is not a metaphysical force equivalent to. say - for example, a physical force like gravity.  Perhaps consciousness is something that is received via something called life and processed into something called awareness.  Change the underlying assumption and the conclusion changes accordingly.  When man assumed the earth was flat, he behaved as if it were.  When man assumed it was round, new worlds were discovered.  Change the assumption and . . . .

Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe. . .

The origin of life may be due to physical laws but what laws govern physical laws?  Seriously, what laws govern metaphysical particles that travel faster than the speed of light - tachyons?  This is a reasonable question that most of sciences narrowly claims is outside its purview. 

Maybe, he (the electron) is wiser than we are?

This undoubtedly is true.  The electron does not breach laws of behavior (action).

How does the brain generate consciousness?

The assumption being made here is that consciousness is an epiphenomenon of matter. Does matter produce consciousness or is consciousness a spiritual of metaphysical phenomenon?  I think it time that science entertain the premise that inorganic matter does not self-organize and in the process create something we loosely call consciousness.  Perhaps consciousness emanates from a non-physical realm?  Is this premise worthy of philosophical entertainment?

                                                                           - - - - - -

Socratus my friend, your presentation appears a rather traditional of reality.  In so many ways, I agree with you but am prepared to extend the range of working assumptions a little further in order to possibly engage additional creative functions.

Gotta Go . . .

Reply to Discussion


Latest Activity

Kernel John left a comment for Randal Ott
"Hi Randal, Sorry for not getting back sooner but I was travelling. Things have been very slow on…"
3 hours ago
Darius Madjzoub left a comment for Sci being
"Is or could science be the answer for everything? Darius"
Darius Madjzoub updated their profile
Darius Madjzoub left a comment for Randal Ott
"Sorry: This is the rest of my comments: All Manifestations have declared similar statements and…"
Randal Ott left a comment for Darius Madjzoub
"I think you left your response to my comment on Amy Lamuel's page instead of mine. Also, it…"
Darius Madjzoub left a comment for Amy Lamuel
"Thank you for your illuminating response. I am not, and have never been masterfully articulate in…"
Randal Ott and Darius Madjzoub are now friends
Randal Ott left a comment for Darius Madjzoub
"Hi, Darius! Unitarian Universalism is a faith based not on a common creed, but rather on a set of…"
Darius Madjzoub left a comment for Bailey Swicegood
"What are your beliefs. Science? Religion? Darius"
Darius Madjzoub left a comment for john Taylor
"You mentioned as subjects "World Religions". Which ones have the most appeal?"
Darius Madjzoub left a comment for jim sutton
"Hi Jim: I am interested to find out how you have arrived at your agnosticism. Did you have a belief…"
Darius Madjzoub left a comment for Randal Ott
"Unitarian Universalism sounds good, but what is its tenets ? Curiously enough, I know a number of…"
Sep 8

© 2014   Created by Sidian M.S. Jones.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service