"I agree kernel. Our ideas and beliefs are to a greater extent what define us and make us who we…"
The mixing of religious and non-religious beliefs in an individual.
Series Debate
This proposal has been accepted for Resolution Debate by Source Arbiter Sidian M.S. Jones.
- If no one debates this topic it will be accepted as is into The Source Code on 6/2/09
- The first member who would like to debate the proposed topic may reply below.
- ONLY TWO PEOPLE PER DEBATE: This means whomever the first member is to step up for debate is the only one allowed (aside from the proposer of the topic) to reply in this thread.
Recommended Reading: The Resolution Debate Process
James Saint proposed the following:
I propose that an addendum to the Resolution Debate process be made to allow time for another debater to step in after a prior debater has expired his reasoning and before the conclusion of the debate topic.
A topic being debated between two people will come to a point where one debater runs out of anything more to add to his case. At this point, whether the issue has been resolved or not, if an additional time is allotted, perhaps 24 hours, for anyone else to step in, more solid resolve can be established with less administration work involving opening up a new debate.
The debater who has run out of anything relevant to add must declare so to allow such a time allotment to begin.
- If no one debates this topic it will be accepted as is into The Source Code on 6/2/09
- The first member who would like to debate the proposed topic may reply below.
- ONLY TWO PEOPLE PER DEBATE: This means whomever the first member is to step up for debate is the only one allowed (aside from the proposer of the topic) to reply in this thread.
Recommended Reading: The Resolution Debate Process
James Saint proposed the following:
I propose that an addendum to the Resolution Debate process be made to allow time for another debater to step in after a prior debater has expired his reasoning and before the conclusion of the debate topic.
A topic being debated between two people will come to a point where one debater runs out of anything more to add to his case. At this point, whether the issue has been resolved or not, if an additional time is allotted, perhaps 24 hours, for anyone else to step in, more solid resolve can be established with less administration work involving opening up a new debate.
The debater who has run out of anything relevant to add must declare so to allow such a time allotment to begin.
Views: 0
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by James S Saint on -
It shouldn't be relevant. Listing as a proposal is the invitation to debate. If no responder presents a case, then there is nothing to debate.
The LA need not mechanically move from proposal to debate to acceptance, just move it to accepted with a note of "default accepted".
Woody said:Doesn't a Logic Arbiter (LA), who is different than the Proposer, need to move a Proposal from the Debate Proposals Forum to the Debate Arena Forum first?
James S Saint said:If it waits for more than 24 hours, it is accepted by default. I thought to argue, but decided to let it go. Sid said he thought it was a good idea.
If you are a qualified Arbiter, which you are, then after 24 hours, you can move it to the accepted forum yourself.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next ›
Top Content This Week
Latest Activity
Kernel John replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?"Yes Roman, our ideas and beliefs can be thought of as territory.
If they are fundamental to…"
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?"Dear Khem, you are an interesting one in that you tend to rebuff first with further questions…"
Kernel John posted a discussionAre Your Religious Beliefs Plausible Facts of Prbable Fiction?
I very much enjoyed the recent Open Source Religion (OSR) discussion about the role regarding the…See More
Khem the Is Real-ite replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?"Please explain what you mean by "scientific". How could proceeding by trial and…"
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?"Your answer must go beyond the the faith mentioned in Hebrews 11:1 and all other similar universal…"
Roman Kozlowski posted a discussionWhat is God? And why the idea of God?
What is God? And why the idea of God?Please explain scientifically, providing irrefutable proof,…See More
Roman Kozlowski replied to Kernel John's discussion God God Para Gate"Cut circle into 4 parts - mmm?"
OpenSourceRlgn via Twitter@davidbgoode People don't rely on definition to believe in a God, they rely on belief. OSR promotes exploration and clarity of beliefs.
DavidBGoode via TwitterAs interesting as the idea of Open Source Religion is, why? If God can be defined by us, why have one at all? http://t.co/AE0FCIwJAa
© 2013 Created by Sidian M.S. Jones.
