The mixing of religious and non-religious beliefs in an individual.

The Topic

Tags: Apostate, Brahma, Divinity, God, Kumaris, Salvation

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James Germiquet on August 31, 2011 at 11:55pm

I certainly agree to direct anyday, That was the point that made me think of Satanists, Their seeming desire to be forthright and truthful, if unforgiving and lacking in compassion.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James Germiquet on August 31, 2011 at 11:58pm

khem

I will agree with jeff on this one.

Jesus is all about forgiveness and Satan is all about an eye for an eye.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kernel John on September 1, 2011 at 12:07am

James, Jeff is essentially a bitch-slapping cowboy. His name calling is abusive and demeaning. If we were in the workplace he'd be out on his Christian ass so fast for harassment he would not know what happened. Look this is Jeff's sandbox. He's just having fun. Let's see if the behavior of the site admin guy can welcome people into staying here or if he will continue to administer a site that is withering. Just observe him over time.

So, I appreciate you efforts but keep you eyes on the behavior. Let me know when you think I'm being unreasonable, illogical or plain unkind. I'm glad to listen. And after you've been around a little longer, I'll be glad to hear from you again on this.

Thanks again for your kind advise.

Cheers.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Khem the Is Real-ite on September 1, 2011 at 12:14am

I repeat: objective truth does not require your agreement. I repeat also that I shre nothing with children.

Christianity is all about over-coming our base natures, the ideal of which is Shaitan/Yeheshuah.

James, you are almost right on the money. But Satan is not about an eye for an eye, he is about the Old Covenant (One may die for the sins of the many). Through being the first sacrifice of the New Covenant (Everyone dies for his own sins) he fulfills the law, and exchanges his old name for the name Jesus Christ, by which all men are saved.

You children are hypnotized by names, which are far more easily changed than fundamental natures.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff H on September 1, 2011 at 12:14am

He just gave you his advice, which you promptly dismissed.

I've kept my word and backed off, which seems to have made you feel more free to call names. I've posted proof that you are attack Christians.

I am very well loved where I work. I am known for absolute honesty and integrity. I gotz peoplz, and my peeps got me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Khem the Is Real-ite on September 1, 2011 at 12:15am

The smartest post you ever made. If all you chumps took Khem's word for it you might see the face of God before you die.

But first you have to put aside your childish ways.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff H on September 1, 2011 at 12:19am

Satan wasn't even about the Law. The Law is honest and pure. Satan was about what wasn't His. He wanted the throne most High. He wanted to be God. He isn't. He lies about the law too. He wrongfully accused Job, and God allowed Job to be proven. He is the accuser, but he makes stuff up if he doesn't have anything to work on.

If Satan had become Jesus, Paul wouldn't have been tormented by Him, and He wouldn't be condemned to one day be cast into the Lake of Fire. We know Satan exist post resurrection, so logically they can't be the same.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff H on September 1, 2011 at 12:21am

I have seen it Khem, and marvel at His work every single day. There is power in God and Christ, and I know it personally because it saved and continues to preserve my life.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kernel John on September 1, 2011 at 7:39am

Correct Jeff, you have backed off and I've laid my assumptions about you on the table. You point out that you don't behave like an ass at work so why be one here. The past is the past. Your recent decorum is recognized and appreciated so we're again listening. I've attached a gift Here's a gift. . . a song written by a friend living in the Bay area. Let me know if you'd ever like to chat with him.

Attachments:

01 Were Listening.mp3, 4.3 MB

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff H on September 1, 2011 at 7:51am

"You point out that you don't behave like an ass at work so why be one here."

You had to get one more in didn't you dipshit.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Kernel John on September 1, 2011 at 8:08am

James, there is the heretical point of view and the prevailing or orthodox point of view. The people who hold the prevailing point of view get to write history and in so doing marginalize the heretics.

You are correct, the orthodox point of view often simply becomes the popular view and attracts those wishing to become part of the popular movement or most accepted trend. As such, they rationalize that because it is the most popular view, it must be correct. . . meaningless logic. I think it was Khem who points out that Humans are essentially herding creatures.

In itself, orthodoxy has little to do with righteousness. Jesus is an excellent example of one who challenged the orthodox view of the day. That's why I gave warning to Khem. It's nice to hear people agree to disagree for a change. I guess the Satanists are not a cultists after all.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James Germiquet on September 1, 2011 at 11:50am

Well I guess you have made your decision and I understand how you feel and why you feel that way. I just wish we could all rise above our feelings and converse in a less antagonistic way towards each other. Whenever I judge others which I sometimes do, I try to consider my self and include my own short comings in the area of which I am making such a judgement, you know the why try to take a gnat or splinter out of someone elses eye when you have a camel or log in your own, concept. I do not think one person is strong enough to bring down a group, it is only when that one person has a equal partner to exchange hostilities with that the spirit of satan can build to the fever pitch necessary to destroy that group. Of course that was just a perspective of mine and has no foundation to prove its validity.