"Sorry Socratus, I missed what you said."
The mixing of religious and non-religious beliefs in an individual.
socratus's Discussions
Dualism of Particle = Philosophy of Idealism.
3 Replies
Started this discussion. Last reply by Kernel John Feb 7.
Dualism = Idealism.
Started Feb 2
Quantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?
1 Reply
Started this discussion. Last reply by Kernel John Apr 25, 2012.
Gifts Received
socratus has not received any gifts yet
socratus's Page
Latest Activity
Kernel John replied to socratus's discussion Dualism of Particle = Philosophy of Idealism."Interesting stuff.
. . . If not Physical then what? Metaphysical? Non-physical? Supernatural? Let's call it Metaphysical.
For example, thoughts are metaphysical. They do not occupy time/space. When a…"
socratus posted a discussionDualism of Particle = Philosophy of Idealism.
Dualism of Particle = Philosophy of Idealism.=.How can intelligence be physical ? How can meaning be physical ? How can thinking be physical ? How can knowing be physical ? How can life or consciousness or free will be physical ?In the name of reason and common sense:How can dualism be equal to idealism ?=.To solve the problem of dualism of particle in physics is equal to solve the problem of idealism in philosophy. Dualism = Idealism.Why?Because in physics we have two ( 2) conceptions of…See More
socratus posted a discussionDualism = Idealism.
Dualism = Idealism.=.How can intelligence be physical ? How can meaning be physical ? How can thinking be physical ? How can knowing be physical ? How can life or consciousness or free will be physical ?In the name of reason and common sense:How can dualism be equal to idealism ?=.To solve the problem of dualism of particle in physics is equal to solve the problem of idealism in philosophy. Dualism = Idealism.Why?Because in physics we have two ( 2) conceptions of impulse:a) Newtonian/ Classical…See More
Kernel John left a comment for socratus"Hi Socratus,
As you know I understand little of particle physics but I do wonder about particles that scientists claim have no mass. Is it possible to destroy or transform a particle that has no mass? Where would such a particle get its energy…"
Kernel John replied to socratus's discussion Quantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?"Hi Socratus,
I'm currently in transit so have not had much time to attend to OSR dialogue. This should stabilize during the 2nd week in May.
Science and well reasoned thinking is always based on assumptions that, in some cases, are…"
socratus posted a discussionQuantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?
Quantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?=.In 1904 Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron The electron and the em waves they are physical reality Can evolution of consciousness of life begin on electron’s level? ==.Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern UniverseElectron takes important part in this workQuestion:Why does the simplest particle - electron have six ( 6 ) formulas: E=h*f, e = +ah*c, e = -ah*c,…See More
Kernel John replied to socratus's discussion QED: Who am I ?"The electromagnetic field of cells is the conduit through which "I" provide instruction and direction. I am the force that directs sells to do what "I" want/need. I am not the cells and I am not the electromagnetic force. …"
socratus posted a discussionQuantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?
Quantum electrodynamics: Who am I ?==.Can QED give the answer to the question: ‘ Who am I ? ’ To answer to this question allow me to take one biological cell.The cell has two ( 2 ) substances: matter and electromagnetic fields. Then we need to understand :Where did the matter and electromagnetic fields come from?Question:Do we need to search for two sources or enough one source ?#Matter and electromagnetic fields are some kind of energy.But matter and energy were tied in one formula:…See More
socratus posted a discussionQED: Who am I ?
QED: Who am I ?==.Cells make copies of themselves.Different cells make different copies of themselves.Cells come in all shapes and sizes.Somehow these different cells are tied between themselvesand during pregnancy process of 9 months gradually ( ! )and by chance ( or not by chance ) they change own geometrical form from zygote to a child. Cells come in all shapes and sizes, and then . . . they are you.Cells they are you ( !? )This is modern biomechanical /chemical point of view.#Maybe 99%…See More
Robert DeFord replied to socratus's discussion God and Physicists."GOD is a metaphysicist at play in your field"
Kernel John replied to socratus's discussion God and Physicists."Will Physicists find God?
Is God a Physicist?"
Profile Information
- What religion or philosophy, if any, do you adhere to?
- physics
- Twitter -
- http://twitter.com/#!/israelsocratus
Comment Wall (3 comments)
- At 2:59am on April 28, 2012, Kernel John said…
Hi Socratus,
As you know I understand little of particle physics but I do wonder about particles that scientists claim have no mass. Is it possible to destroy or transform a particle that has no mass? Where would such a particle get its energy from and more importantly how would it receive its energy. I know, silly questions - but perhaps you might share some perspective.
Kernel John
- At 1:19pm on August 2, 2011, Kernel John said…
Thank you Israel for sharing more detail. It is a little beyond my immediate comprehension but I'm certain others, like Roman, will also benefit.
- At 9:26am on August 2, 2011, Kernel John said…
Hello again socratus,
Could you expand further on you proposition - here.
This would be of interest to some and potentially contribute to the Open Source Spirituality agenda here.
Thanking you in advance.
Cheers
Top Content This Week
Latest Activity
Roman Kozlowski replied to Kernel John's discussion Open Source Religion Tool Kit"Infants laughing or crying is not becuase of memories of past lives."
Roman Kozlowski left a comment for Kernel John"Dear Kernel, I think I might have removed you accidentally along with rest of my emails the…"
Roman Kozlowski replied to rob stone's discussion Predestined for Glorification"Are you restricting yourself only to the God of the bible in your searh for universal truth?"
Roman Kozlowski replied to Kernel John's discussion Are Your Religious Beliefs Plausible Facts of Probable Fiction?""Plausible facts of probable fiction?" - I know what you mean.
The danger is that fiction…"
sriv_anu via TwitterRT @guunjanjha: 2. @scotchism with all types of men and malicious intents. And it is natural for such a "free" open-source religion. What @HinduIDF
guunjanjha via Twitter2. @scotchism with all types of men and malicious intents. And it is natural for such a "free" open-source religion. What @HinduIDF
rob stone posted a discussionPredestined for Glorification
We cannot earn salvation, and we can never lose salvation, because salvation is based not upon what…See More
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?"I agree kernel. Our ideas and beliefs are to a greater extent what define us and make us who we…"
Kernel John replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?"Yes Roman, our ideas and beliefs can be thought of as territory.
If they are fundamental to…"
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?"Dear Khem, you are an interesting one in that you tend to rebuff first with further questions…"
Kernel John posted a discussionAre Your Religious Beliefs Plausible Facts of Prbable Fiction?
I very much enjoyed the recent Open Source Religion (OSR) discussion about the role regarding the…See More
© 2013 Created by Sidian M.S. Jones.
