Original post at: http://www.unorule.com/oneism/

Philosophical evolution of the blog and following the feedback received on the ‘Youism’, I would like to make this contribution by declaring and defining my own religion / ideology. Moreover, the name fits perfectly with the rule of the ONE, the Oneism

The first idea behind this ideology is the power of oneself. Each one has control of its life, and nobody else. Nobody but we ourselves have that capability. Nobody can help to who does not want to be helped.

In favor of the theory of the change, not improvement. Improvement would be to get closer to perfection. Humans can not know what that of perfection is, then we cannot improve. Therefore, all we can do is change. Change to what each one considers the best for itself.

The second main value of the ideology, tolerance. All we are right in our own lives, no one in others’. Only by mutual agreement we will come to a peaceful and beneficial coexistence to all parties.

These are the elements Oneism.

Oneism

Based on the three basic principles of the rule of the ONE plus the three rules of reality.

The basic principles

  1. The rule of the ONE universal

    Everything has a cause, even if we do not know it.

    We do not have to confuse cause and goal. The goals are artificial creations by humans. The causes are those that trigger or motivate an event.

  2. Universal Definition

    Each concept has a unique universal definition.

    Every concept is a human creation. Let us reach a universal agreement. Why would it be required more than one definition for the same concept? Let’s do it unique.

  3. The rule of the ONE individual

    We can only think one thing at a time.

    It is the basis of the whole theory of happiness and overcoming. Our mistakes are due to our thought that was not focused where it should have been. Unfortunately, we learn based on errors, experience instructs us in life.

The three rules of reality

With these three rules I justify that all of us are right and not at the same time.

  1. Our reality is individual.

    Our beliefs and knowledge define our own reality, each one’s. This is individual and personal. No one can share identical realities by the subjectivity of each one.

  2. Existence is definition.

    The fact of defining a concept, gives it existence.

  3. Real existence is perception.

    But the real existence is perception. If not, it is simply a belief.

Finally I concluded that whether or not the absolute truth exists, no human would be able to know it based on our imperfection. Therefore, nobody has the right to impose their beliefs or ideas.

Views: 22

Comment by RevLindsay G King on June 9, 2012 at 4:24pm

"Therefore, nobody has the right to impose their beliefs or ideas."
A very good idea. BTW, I have the feeling that Oneism and www.unitheism.org  --Warren Farr and I have a unitheism group on FaceBook--are on the same path in G~O~D~~that which is good, opportune and desirable

Comment

You need to be a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network to add comments!

Join The Open Source Religion Social Network

Latest Activity

Profile IconBeliefGenome via Twitter
Pope proclaims all redeemed, even atheists. "The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us, with the Blood of... http://t.co/v3noB6170d
Twitter21 hours ago · Reply · Retweet
Roman Kozlowski left a comment for Sidian M.S. Jones
"Dear Sid, love your site. Please keep it alive. I've noticed since the name change, many…"
23 hours ago
Jean Mailloux is now a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network
yesterday
Roman Kozlowski replied to Kernel John's discussion Open Source Religion Tool Kit
"Infants laughing or crying is not becuase of memories of past lives."
Monday
Roman Kozlowski left a comment for Kernel John
"Dear Kernel, I think I might have removed you accidentally along with rest of my emails the…"
Monday
Roman Kozlowski replied to rob stone's discussion Predestined for Glorification
"Are you restricting yourself only to the God of the bible in your searh for universal truth?"
Monday
Roman Kozlowski replied to Kernel John's discussion Are Your Religious Beliefs Plausible Facts of Probable Fiction?
""Plausible facts of probable fiction?" - I know what you mean. The danger is that fiction…"
Monday
Denis A. Kitchen is now a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network
Sunday
Profile Iconsriv_anu via Twitter
RT @guunjanjha: 2. @scotchism with all types of men and malicious intents. And it is natural for such a "free" open-source religion. What @HinduIDF
TwitterSunday · Reply · Retweet
Profile Iconguunjanjha via Twitter
2. @scotchism with all types of men and malicious intents. And it is natural for such a "free" open-source religion. What @HinduIDF
TwitterSunday · Reply · Retweet
rob stone posted a discussion

Predestined for Glorification

We cannot earn salvation, and we can never lose salvation, because salvation is based not upon what…See More
Sunday
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"I agree kernel. Our ideas and beliefs are to a greater extent what define us and make us who we…"
Saturday

© 2013   Created by Sidian M.S. Jones.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service