Original post at: http://www.unorule.com/oneism/

Philosophical evolution of the blog and following the feedback received on the ‘Youism’, I would like to make this contribution by declaring and defining my own religion / ideology. Moreover, the name fits perfectly with the rule of the ONE, the Oneism

The first idea behind this ideology is the power of oneself. Each one has control of its life, and nobody else. Nobody but we ourselves have that capability. Nobody can help to who does not want to be helped.

In favor of the theory of the change, not improvement. Improvement would be to get closer to perfection. Humans can not know what that of perfection is, then we cannot improve. Therefore, all we can do is change. Change to what each one considers the best for itself.

The second main value of the ideology, tolerance. All we are right in our own lives, no one in others’. Only by mutual agreement we will come to a peaceful and beneficial coexistence to all parties.

These are the elements Oneism.

Oneism

Based on the three basic principles of the rule of the ONE plus the three rules of reality.

The basic principles

  1. The rule of the ONE universal

    Everything has a cause, even if we do not know it.

    We do not have to confuse cause and goal. The goals are artificial creations by humans. The causes are those that trigger or motivate an event.

  2. Universal Definition

    Each concept has a unique universal definition.

    Every concept is a human creation. Let us reach a universal agreement. Why would it be required more than one definition for the same concept? Let’s do it unique.

  3. The rule of the ONE individual

    We can only think one thing at a time.

    It is the basis of the whole theory of happiness and overcoming. Our mistakes are due to our thought that was not focused where it should have been. Unfortunately, we learn based on errors, experience instructs us in life.

The three rules of reality

With these three rules I justify that all of us are right and not at the same time.

  1. Our reality is individual.

    Our beliefs and knowledge define our own reality, each one’s. This is individual and personal. No one can share identical realities by the subjectivity of each one.

  2. Existence is definition.

    The fact of defining a concept, gives it existence.

  3. Real existence is perception.

    But the real existence is perception. If not, it is simply a belief.

Finally I concluded that whether or not the absolute truth exists, no human would be able to know it based on our imperfection. Therefore, nobody has the right to impose their beliefs or ideas.

Views: 22

Comment by RevLindsay G King on June 9, 2012 at 4:24pm

"Therefore, nobody has the right to impose their beliefs or ideas."
A very good idea. BTW, I have the feeling that Oneism and www.unitheism.org  --Warren Farr and I have a unitheism group on FaceBook--are on the same path in G~O~D~~that which is good, opportune and desirable

Comment

You need to be a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network to add comments!

Join The Open Source Religion Social Network

Latest Activity

Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"Photons stimulating visual cortex within sight sense alone do not account for the blind and…"
16 minutes ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion WHAT MAKES A BELIEF A BELIEF?
"The very openness of this site is the very crux of understanding"
1 hour ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to rob stone's discussion Predestined for Glorification
"Serious discussion is the be all."
1 hour ago
Kernel John replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"Roman, you say, "Knowledge or perception is a thought-wave in the mind."  Do not…"
12 hours ago
Sidian M.S. Jones replied to Sidian M.S. Jones's discussion What is the Belief Genome?
"I'm just glad people still care. :) And to be fair, I should be here commenting, sharing…"
16 hours ago
Kernel John replied to Kernel John's discussion Are Your Religious Beliefs Plausible Facts of Probable Fiction?
"Yes, we must be able to separate fact from fiction.  To do this, we must become aware of being…"
17 hours ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Sidian M.S. Jones's discussion What is the Belief Genome?
"Sid, now I understand, and you state your position well. It's one of the finest sites of its…"
17 hours ago
Roman Kozlowski posted a discussion

WHAT MAKES A BELIEF A BELIEF?

What makes a Belief a Belief?The Bible says "Faith is the assured expectation of things hoped for,…See More
19 hours ago
Sidian M.S. Jones replied to Sidian M.S. Jones's discussion What is the Belief Genome?
"I don't mind being called out too much but my general experience is that people's…"
19 hours ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Sidian M.S. Jones's discussion What is the Belief Genome?
"Please show some backbone and at least take part in leading discussion from time to time if you…"
20 hours ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Sidian M.S. Jones's discussion What is the Belief Genome?
"This multi-fragmentational disintergration of proposed thought en-mass in this way is the most…"
21 hours ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Sidian M.S. Jones's discussion What is the Belief Genome?
"What do you want to really know?"
22 hours ago

© 2013   Created by Sidian M.S. Jones.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service