Original post at: http://www.unorule.com/oneism/

Philosophical evolution of the blog and following the feedback received on the ‘Youism’, I would like to make this contribution by declaring and defining my own religion / ideology. Moreover, the name fits perfectly with the rule of the ONE, the Oneism

The first idea behind this ideology is the power of oneself. Each one has control of its life, and nobody else. Nobody but we ourselves have that capability. Nobody can help to who does not want to be helped.

In favor of the theory of the change, not improvement. Improvement would be to get closer to perfection. Humans can not know what that of perfection is, then we cannot improve. Therefore, all we can do is change. Change to what each one considers the best for itself.

The second main value of the ideology, tolerance. All we are right in our own lives, no one in others’. Only by mutual agreement we will come to a peaceful and beneficial coexistence to all parties.

These are the elements Oneism.

Oneism

Based on the three basic principles of the rule of the ONE plus the three rules of reality.

The basic principles

  1. The rule of the ONE universal

    Everything has a cause, even if we do not know it.

    We do not have to confuse cause and goal. The goals are artificial creations by humans. The causes are those that trigger or motivate an event.

  2. Universal Definition

    Each concept has a unique universal definition.

    Every concept is a human creation. Let us reach a universal agreement. Why would it be required more than one definition for the same concept? Let’s do it unique.

  3. The rule of the ONE individual

    We can only think one thing at a time.

    It is the basis of the whole theory of happiness and overcoming. Our mistakes are due to our thought that was not focused where it should have been. Unfortunately, we learn based on errors, experience instructs us in life.

The three rules of reality

With these three rules I justify that all of us are right and not at the same time.

  1. Our reality is individual.

    Our beliefs and knowledge define our own reality, each one’s. This is individual and personal. No one can share identical realities by the subjectivity of each one.

  2. Existence is definition.

    The fact of defining a concept, gives it existence.

  3. Real existence is perception.

    But the real existence is perception. If not, it is simply a belief.

Finally I concluded that whether or not the absolute truth exists, no human would be able to know it based on our imperfection. Therefore, nobody has the right to impose their beliefs or ideas.

Views: 22

Comment by RevLindsay G King on June 9, 2012 at 4:24pm

"Therefore, nobody has the right to impose their beliefs or ideas."
A very good idea. BTW, I have the feeling that Oneism and www.unitheism.org  --Warren Farr and I have a unitheism group on FaceBook--are on the same path in G~O~D~~that which is good, opportune and desirable

Comment

You need to be a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network to add comments!

Join The Open Source Religion Social Network

Latest Activity

andrewjvb replied to Geoff's discussion Pascal's Wager.... What do you believe?
"The penalties for having no belief may not be so grand as the rewards for holding them. But in an…"
13 hours ago
Lion Goodman is now a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network
17 hours ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Geoff's discussion Pascal's Wager.... What do you believe?
" "
18 hours ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Geoff's discussion Pascal's Wager.... What do you believe?
"Kernel. I've just explained that being held to ransome by non-scientific religious dogma can…"
19 hours ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to atypican's discussion The time has arrived
"atypican. Kind thanks for explaining things so thoroughly. Like you say, a "project presents a…"
19 hours ago
Kernel John replied to Geoff's discussion Pascal's Wager.... What do you believe?
"The penalties for having no belief may not be so grand as the rewards for holding them.  "
19 hours ago
atypican replied to atypican's discussion The time has arrived
"The "something in this" is that Free Press Bible doesn't define itself as A…"
23 hours ago
andrewjvb replied to atypican's discussion The time has arrived
"I agree completely.  I am pro-"mysterious human."  I despise this need for…"
yesterday
andrewjvb replied to Geoff's discussion Pascal's Wager.... What do you believe?
"The argument is stupid, because it applies so generally to so many different things.  Even…"
yesterday
Roman Kozlowski replied to atypican's discussion The time has arrived
"A. "Users are also free to create groups so they can network more closely with people they…"
yesterday
atypican replied to atypican's discussion The time has arrived
"Another good question. There are some people who are looking to have such discussions, and others…"
Tuesday
Roman Kozlowski replied to Geoff's discussion Pascal's Wager.... What do you believe?
"The serious thing is, that by your giving into such a notion, frees you of extra efforts, and…"
Monday

© 2013   Created by Sidian M.S. Jones.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service