Assume:

everything is equivalent to god 

everything is equivalent to everything

god is what allows existence 

 

Propose:

at one point in time the only existence was god, god than split into two - world and life. 

world kept splitting into time and space

life kept splitting into energy and mass

and if we use belief to perceive time,

and our eyes and senses to perceive space,

and our feelings to perceive energy,

than all we have left to perceive is mass and logic is something that must decide whether something is correct or not.

 

Conclude:

if logic chooses to believe in existence than it will continue, if not it will end.

Views: 18

Comment by Kernel John on August 4, 2011 at 2:59pm

I like your idea of declaring your assumptions before you propose your argument.  This is GREAT.

It will be interesting to hear what other say but to me your assumptions may be illogical - therefore what follows would be too.

 

If God allows existence, then everything which is equivalent/equal to God would therefore also allow existence (etc.) - else it would not be equal. . . .  Or are you arguing that things that are equivalent are not the same or can be fundamentally different? 

.

Comment by Amir Yaari on August 4, 2011 at 5:30pm

if the assumptions are illogical and therefore not correct than the entire description of everything is incorrect and therefore there is no existence.

but there is existence.

 

I don't know or believe in existence, I assume there is existence. 

 

yes everything else also allows existence.

equivalent is not being equal, it's the state of being interchangeable, just like energy is interchangeable with mass as Einstein proposed: E=MC^2 and so life splits into energy and mass according to that equation.

 

 

Comment

You need to be a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network to add comments!

Join The Open Source Religion Social Network

Latest Activity

Jean Mailloux is now a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network
1 hour ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Kernel John's discussion Open Source Religion Tool Kit
"Infants laughing or crying is not becuase of memories of past lives."
yesterday
Roman Kozlowski left a comment for Kernel John
"Dear Kernel, I think I might have removed you accidentally along with rest of my emails the…"
yesterday
Roman Kozlowski replied to rob stone's discussion Predestined for Glorification
"Are you restricting yourself only to the God of the bible in your searh for universal truth?"
yesterday
Roman Kozlowski replied to Kernel John's discussion Are Your Religious Beliefs Plausible Facts of Probable Fiction?
""Plausible facts of probable fiction?" - I know what you mean. The danger is that fiction…"
yesterday
Denis A. Kitchen is now a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network
Sunday
Profile Iconsriv_anu via Twitter
RT @guunjanjha: 2. @scotchism with all types of men and malicious intents. And it is natural for such a "free" open-source religion. What @HinduIDF
TwitterSunday · Reply · Retweet
Profile Iconguunjanjha via Twitter
2. @scotchism with all types of men and malicious intents. And it is natural for such a "free" open-source religion. What @HinduIDF
TwitterSunday · Reply · Retweet
rob stone posted a discussion

Predestined for Glorification

We cannot earn salvation, and we can never lose salvation, because salvation is based not upon what…See More
Sunday
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"I agree kernel. Our ideas and beliefs are to a greater extent what define us and make us who we…"
Saturday
Kernel John replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"Yes Roman, our ideas and beliefs can be thought of as territory.  If they are fundamental to…"
Saturday
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"Dear Khem, you are an interesting one in that you tend to rebuff first with further questions…"
Saturday

© 2013   Created by Sidian M.S. Jones.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service