User's Manual for the Mind - Robert Fritz

It's a long string of events that brought me to Robert Fritz. Brian Smith (Necessary Revolution) suggested I contact Judy Archer-Jones to take the DMA course. This was 1985 and DMA apparently stood for Dimensional Macro-structural Alignment... or something like that. The course was devised by a musician-artist guy - Robert Fritz. I've never met Robert but have read his writings and followed his diminutive career - he now offers training in rural Vermont.

Robert's award winning feature film "OVERLOAD" will be shown following their 20th Anniversary reception being held on Tuesday, November 9th. Screening time
is 7:30pm – 9:30pm. On Wednesday morning, November 10th Robert will be
the featured speaker. His talk is entitled "The Structural Dynamics of
Leadership". For more information, or to register for the conference: pegasus.prod.ifpeople.net/

His recent newsletter, to which I subscribe, speaks about the mind and its naughty tendency to resolve differences - whether they deserve to be resolved or not. It's a little lengthy but worth the read.

Views: 179

Tags: fritz, mind

Comment by Kernel John on September 4, 2010 at 10:18pm
User's Manual for the Mind - by: Robert Fritz
The mind strives to reconcile differences. But beware!.
Your brain will signal that the cloud formation before your very face shows that of Mickey Mouse even when that clearly is not the case. You on the other hand will likely remark to another that you saw Mickey in sky and the cult of the Elevated Mouse would be born.
Comment by david thurman on September 5, 2010 at 7:11am
nicely done Kernel. That is exactly what happens in religion, and other collective groups, no doubt about it. We can see it in group think with the BP disaster, where the collective reduces the perception for precautions and thus leads to the conclusion for no need for precautions due to limited potential liability.

Sometimes when you get a group together, the togetherness gives a false impression of being rational due to isolation and group think. Organized Religion is very much group think, the Pope does not lead as much as speaks for the collective. Cults rise not because of the speaker but because the perceptions of the individual are already inclined to what the cult leader is saying. In a sense cult leaders play in the field of misconceptions and false conclusions.

What is articulated above reminds me very much of Ed Ricketts, who basically was saying the same thing. He was influential of Joesph Campbell according to the story, and he was barely known and definitely not famous.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Ricketts
Comment by david thurman on September 5, 2010 at 7:19am
I'll also add that organized religion is a at it's worst a prepackaged conceptualization that is used to create a social network or belief system, and it's used to explain certain types of experiences.That reductive tendency is a major problem in Christianity but we live in a world awash with irrational reductionism now, don't we, ..:D....I might point to Trans-humanism as technology Christians for the 21st century, as simply moving from Jesus saves to technology saves as a prime example.
Comment by Roman Kozlowski on September 5, 2010 at 7:33am
All I can say is at least thank 'god(?)' for the rigours of modern scientifi methodology to counteract such things.
Comment by david thurman on September 5, 2010 at 7:40am
I also might add you might actually try and do the above sometime in context to being a tree. Consciousness is a tree of ground and figure state at the same time. below is a tree.

Comment by david thurman on September 5, 2010 at 7:43am
I couldn't resist here's another tree with rings in plan and elevation at the same time. How is it possible to capture plan and elevation at the same time? It's because causality is non linear.

Comment by david thurman on September 5, 2010 at 7:47am
Amen Roman
Comment by david thurman on September 5, 2010 at 5:33pm
love the pic alexander!!!!
Comment by david thurman on September 5, 2010 at 6:47pm
nicely done. i used truespace years ago but it didn't fit into my work very well, I opted to stick to rhino. Hopefully I'll get some renderings together from zbrush now that I"ve gotten a new tablet, that's my fun program but I'm not talented enough to post anything here from that program..LOL... I will soon though.
Comment by david thurman on September 5, 2010 at 8:04pm
Alexander i did a quick 5 minute of the Kernel. :D Actually it took me 7 minutes from pure scratch. The programs are starting to get so fast and easy to use not it's unbelievable.

Comment

You need to be a member of The Open Source Religion Social Network to add comments!

Join The Open Source Religion Social Network

Latest Activity

rob stone posted a discussion

Predestined for Glorification

We cannot earn salvation, and we can never lose salvation, because salvation is based not upon what…See More
45 minutes ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"I agree kernel. Our ideas and beliefs are to a greater extent what define us and make us who we…"
20 hours ago
Kernel John replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"Yes Roman, our ideas and beliefs can be thought of as territory.  If they are fundamental to…"
23 hours ago
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"Dear Khem, you are an interesting one in that you tend to rebuff first with further questions…"
yesterday
Kernel John posted a discussion

Are Your Religious Beliefs Plausible Facts of Prbable Fiction?

I very much enjoyed the recent Open Source Religion (OSR) discussion about the role regarding the…See More
Friday
Kernel John replied to Kernel John's discussion God God Para Gate
"Thanks for the insight."
Friday
Postal updated their profile
Friday
Khem the Is Real-ite replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"Please explain what you mean by "scientific".  How could proceeding by trial and…"
Thursday
Roman Kozlowski replied to Roman Kozlowski's discussion What is God? And why the idea of God?
"Your answer must go beyond the the faith mentioned in Hebrews 11:1 and all other similar universal…"
Wednesday
Roman Kozlowski posted a discussion

What is God? And why the idea of God?

What is God? And why the idea of God?Please explain scientifically, providing irrefutable proof,…See More
Wednesday
Roman Kozlowski replied to Kernel John's discussion God God Para Gate
"Cut circle into 4 parts - mmm?"
Wednesday
Profile IconOpenSourceRlgn via Twitter
@davidbgoode People don't rely on definition to believe in a God, they rely on belief. OSR promotes exploration and clarity of beliefs.
TwitterWednesday · Reply · Retweet

© 2013   Created by Sidian M.S. Jones.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service